After thinking about this a bit, it might be better to phrase the question thusly:
Which is more outlandish and fantastical in their beliefs: Scientology or mainstream psychoanalysis?
You are of course familiar with the ideas of the Oedipus Complex, the Castration Complex, the id, ego and super ego, penis envy, that vaginal orgasm, the death instinct, the primal scene and primal crime, transference, and the Freudian defense mechanisms. Here is the diagnosis, from the founder of psychoanalysis himself, of a patient's recurring dream about dogs sitting in a tree outside his window:
That's a pretty fantastic stretch, no? We certainly cannot attribute this particular reading of Freud's to the entire 20th century psychoanalysis community. However, just this sort of interpretation remains common today in the (albeit fading) world of professional psychoanalysis and its supporting academics -- who also continue to embrace the central concepts listed above based largely on the "evidence" based on analysands with such diagnoses.
One could say that Freudian concepts are less fantastic than Rapture type beliefs simply because they presume to be entirely natural, but the same thing could be said of scientology. In addition, Freud and to a great extent psychoanalysm of today claim that many of their spectacular claims are beyond the "positivism" of scientific measure.
Page Information
|
Wiki Information
|
![]() Update to PBwiki 2.0 An entirely new PBwiki experience, including folders and easier editing. |